Sunday, June 05, 2016

In Our Opinion....


We received the following request from a reader in comments on Friday's post:

@THE ATA TEAM: IF POSSIBLE I WOULD LIKE YOU TO SHOW THE CLIP OF ANA NAVARRO'S ANGER AGAINST TRUMP. WE SELDOM SEE ANY OF THE PANELIST SO FIRED UP AND THIS IS A CLASSIC AND SHE SAYS ALL THE THINGS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN SAID LONG AGO. IT WAS ON THIS PAST FRIDAY, THE 3RD, AND IT CAME ON AFTER THE FIRST 30 MINUTES, AND ANDERSON WAS ANCHORING 360. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. HOPE ANA'S RANT SERVES AS A WAKE UP CALL TO EVERY TRUMP SUPPORTER.

Here's the clip:
video

We feel this is an excellent example of the dangers of a Donald Trump presidency.  As Anderson pointed out what would the reaction be if you substituted "Jew, African-American, etc." for Mexican and what would the reaction be if Hillary Clinton made the statement?    CNN's obsession with covering all things Trump (for ratings) has contributed to things reaching the point where good, loyal Republicans like Ana Navarro can no longer remain silent.


AC360 Transcript
AC360 Podcast


All content, unless otherwise cited, is © All Things Anderson and may not be used without consent of the blog administrator.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Erica Hill is returning to HLN from New York.

http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/erica-hill-leaves-nbc-news-returns-to-hln/295300

Jaanza said...

ATA, thanks for posting this video. For some odd reason this footage of Ana Navarro blasting Trump and blasting him well, is not available on the 360 website.

It was good seeing Navarro's rant again. When I posted on Friday I totally forgot about the part about his numerous (was it 5?) deferments during the VietNam War.

It's about 40 minutes to Monday's 360. Today Trump has been telling his "surrogates" i.e. parrots, to also discredit Judge Curiel. I'm still hoping for a McEnany / Navarro showdown.

TaxIncidence said...

To those people who've for the past month or so been saying there's some sort of conservative bias on AC360--I'm just saying, there are plenty if not more people who think it's biased the other way. Check Twitter. I'm not saying it's totally free of bias, but if I were Mr. Cooper and half the internet was calling my show a Trump glorification program and the other half was accusing me of shilling for Hillary Clinton, I'd be pretty damn happy with myself as a journalist as far as objectivity goes.

Anonymous said...

@THE ATA TEAM: THANKS FOR THE CLIP OF ANA NAVARRO. I AM SURPRISED IT HAS NOT GOTTEN MORE PLAY
ON ALL THE CABLE NETWORKS....DID I JUST SAY THAT?
WHY SHOULD I BE SURPRISED.....IT'S TOTAL NEGATIVITY FOR TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS.
AND ANDERSON, THOUGH IT WAS NOT SHOWN, WAS TOTALLY SURPRISED AT ANA NAVARRO'S ANGER, EVEN
THOUGH HE KNEW SHE'D BE A GUEST.
SHE WAS ON AGAIN TONIGHT. NOT QUITE AS ANGRY, BUT PUMPED. AH GOOD FOR THOSE RATINGS CNN!

Anonymous said...

@TaxIncidence I don't think searching Anderson Cooper on Twitter is a good way to measure coverage of any topic. I just checked before replying to you and it's obvious that many people tweeting don't even watch AC360. They are still tweeting that Anderson covered up a Hillary Clinton story that he did a clarification segment on two weeks ago. Twitter is often an echo chamber depending on who people follow, not to mention how many people remain anonymous, have multiple accounts and just spam their opinions all day long creating a false sense of the general opinion.

I think most people's complaints around here are the endless hours of Trump coverage, positive or negative. In the first hour of tonight's AC360, the first 45 minutes were spent on Trump. That's just a fact.

Anonymous said...

@11:38 PM GOOD RESPONSE BUT THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE LIKE MYSELF, WHO DO NOT TEXT OR TWEET.
IT MAY WELL BE THE FUTURE, BUT IT IS INSANE FOR DONALD TRUMP TO BE "TWEETING" ANYTHING. DOES PRESIDENT OBAMA TWEET HIS REACTIONS TO PARCELS OF NEWS COVERAGE?? DOES HE USE A TWEET ACCOUNT TO DEFEND HIMSELF FROM BLATANT GOP LIES? IMHO TWEETING POLITICAL POLICY IS NONSENSE.
IS TRUMP NINE YEARS OLD OR THE "BABY-MAN" JON STEWART SAID HE WAS? HE HAS PROVEN TO BE BOTH.